EFFECT OF DIGITAL ADDICTION ON ATTENTION SPAN
Main Article Content
Abstract
Digital addiction has emerged as a significant psychological and social concern in the contemporary technological era. The widespread adoption of smartphones, social media platforms, online gaming, and short-form video applications has profoundly influenced human behavior and cognitive functioning. This research paper examines the impact of digital addiction on attention span, with particular emphasis on adolescents and young adults. Excessive engagement with digital devices promotes multitasking, rapid information processing, and frequent task switching, all of which can adversely affect sustained attention and concentration. The study reviews existing literature, relevant psychological theories, and recent empirical findings to explore the relationship between digital media use and cognitive performance. A qualitative research approach based on secondary data analysis was employed to investigate the association between digital addiction and diminished attention span. The findings suggest that prolonged screen exposure, persistent digital notifications, and compulsive social media use contribute to cognitive overload, memory impairment, reduced academic performance, and weakened attentional control. Additionally, sleep disturbances and psychological stress associated with excessive digital engagement further exacerbate attention-related difficulties. Nevertheless, moderate and purposeful use of digital technologies can offer educational and cognitive advantages. The paper concludes that promoting balanced digital consumption, implementing awareness initiatives, encouraging digital detox practices, and fostering healthy technology-use habits are essential for safeguarding cognitive well-being and enhancing attention span in the digital age.
Downloads
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Author(s) and co-author(s) jointly and severally represent and warrant that the Article is original with the author(s) and does not infringe any copyright or violate any other right of any third parties, and that the Article has not been published elsewhere. Author(s) agree to the terms that the IJRDO Journal will have the full right to remove the published article on any misconduct found in the published article.
References
2.Moshel, M. L., Warburton, W. A., Batchelor, J., Bennett, J. M., & Ko, K. Y. (2024). Neuropsychological deficits in disordered screen use behaviours: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Neuropsychology Review, 34, 791–822.
3.Ansel, A. K., & Pandey, N. (2025). The effect of internet addiction on the attention span of university students. International Journal of Interdisciplinary Approaches in Psychology, 3(5), 798–806.
4.Upshaw, J. D., Stevens, C. E., Ganis, G., & Zabelina, D. L. (2022). The hidden cost of a smartphone: The effects of smartphone notifications on cognitive control. PLOS ONE, 17(11), e0277220.
5.Marin, M. G., Nuñez, X., & Almeida, R. M. M. (2021). Internet addiction and attention in adolescents: A systematic review. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 24(4), 205–216.
6.Pranathi, J. S. R., & Jacob, A. M. (2025). Impact of short form videos on attention span mediated by sleep quality and stress. International Journal of Interdisciplinary Approaches in Psychology, 3(4), 11–31.
7.Sampalo, M., Lázaro, E., & Luna, P. M. (2023). Action video gaming and attention in young adults: A systematic review. Journal of Attention Disorders, 27(5), 489–503.
8.Arena, F., Accetta, A. S., Godfrey, F., Bartolotta, C., & Scaramuzzino, C. (2025). Techno-mediated cognitive processes. Addiction & Social Media Communication, 2(1), 44–59.
9.Mark, G. (2023). Attention span: A groundbreaking way to restore balance, happiness and productivity. Hanover Square Press.
10.Carr, N. (2020). The shallows: What the internet is doing to our brains. W. W. Norton & Company.
11.Alter, A. (2017). Irresistible: The rise of addictive technology and the business of keeping us hooked. Penguin Press.
12.Twenge, J. M. (2020). iGen: Why today’s super-connected kids are growing up less rebellious, more tolerant, less happy. Atria Books.
13.Rosen, L. D. (2017). The distracted mind: Ancient brains in a high-tech world. MIT Press.
14.Ophir, E., Nass, C., & Wagner, A. D. (2009). Cognitive control in media multitaskers. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106(37), 15583–15587.
15.Wilmer, H. H., Sherman, L. E., & Chein, J. M. (2017). Smartphones and cognition: A review of research. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 605.
16.Duke, É., & Montag, C. (2017). Smartphone addiction and beyond: Initial insights on an emerging research topic. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 361.
17.Cain, M. S., & Mitroff, S. R. (2011). Distractor filtering in media multitaskers. Perception, 40(10), 1183–1192.
18.Loh, K. K., & Kanai, R. (2016). How has the internet reshaped human cognition? The Neuroscientist, 22(5), 506–520.
19.Kushlev, K., Proulx, J., & Dunn, E. W. (2017). Digitally connected, socially disconnected. Computers in Human Behavior, 75, 68–76.
20.Ward, A. F., Duke, K., Gneezy, A., & Bos, M. W. (2017). Brain drain: The mere presence of one’s own smartphone reduces available cognitive capacity. Journal of the Association for Consumer Research, 2(2), 140–154.